RESEARCH

Children and young people

Through our research, we contribute to the development of effective policies and interventions that support the well-being, growth, and prospects of children and young people.

We have developed deep experience and knowledge in this area. For example, we supported the Independent Review of Children’s Social Care, providing estimates of how much is spent in the current system in England and the social cost of adverse outcomes for children in need.

Our team of social researchers has extensive practical experience engaging directly with young people on sensitive issues. A strict code of ethics and robust safeguarding protocols underpin all our research involving children and young people.

Below you can find some of our recent work.


Independent Review of Children’s Social Care

Alma Economics was commissioned by the Independent Review of Children’s Social Care to provide economic analysis to support the Review team to reform children’s social care (CSC) in England.

In the first phase of the project, we estimated the annual expenditure on CSC and the cost of adverse outcomes for children in need (CIN). To estimate the annual expenditure on CSC, we collated data on expenditure on services provided by local authorities to CIN as well as preventative services provided to the wider population. We used regression coefficients from the literature that account for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics to calculate the increased probability of children in need experiencing adverse outcomes. The adverse outcomes considered include educational outcomes, labour market outcomes, mental and physical health, criminal behaviour, and homelessness. The social cost of the adverse outcomes was estimated by exploring the impact of these outcomes on wellbeing, productivity losses, and expenditure on public services. 

In the second phase of the project, we estimated the cost and impact on society of the policy recommendations developed by the Review team. We developed a comprehensive set of models estimating the impact of each recommendation on public finances and produced a Social Cost-Benefit Analysis reflecting costs and benefits to society. We designed our models in a flexible manner to allow us to test the impact of different policy parameters and states of the world to inform the work of the Review.

Read more about our work here.

Paying the Price

The independent review of children’s social care – final report

Costing and outline CBA of the  Independent Review of Children’s  Social Care recommendations: Modelling assumptions

For more details and press coverage, visit our blog post.


Analysis of Rapid Reviews on serious incidents involving children in England

Our team reviewed the multiagency review reports submitted to the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel by local Safeguarding Partnerships between January 2021 and January 2022. Widely known as Rapid Reviews, these reports are the outcome of multiagency meetings held at the local level following any serious child safeguarding incident.

Extracting quantitative and qualitative data from the Rapid Reviews, and further examining them through a dual process of coding and human-eye review, our team provided a multi-layered analysis of key factors known to affect the course of serious child safeguarding incidents. These factors included child demographics, categories of death and serious harm, parent/family characteristics and circumstances affecting the household, child characteristics and vulnerabilities, and service involvement with the children and/or their families. The interplay of different factors was also analysed to highlight cumulative risks and overarching vulnerabilities.  

Alongside this analysis, the annual review submitted to the Panel discussed the quality of the Rapid Reviews, with a focus on examples of good practice and areas requiring improvement. These can be taken forward by local Safeguarding Partnerships to strengthen their Rapid Reviews and streamline processes for the safeguarding of children.

➥ Findings from our work have been included in the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel’s Annual Report 2021, which can be found here.


The cost of inaction in the children’s social care sector

Alma Economics was commissioned by Action for Children, Barnardo’s, The Children’s Society, the National Children’s Bureau, and the NSPCC to compare the costs and benefits of the government’s Stable Homes, Built on Love Strategy for reform of children’s social care with recommendations made by the Independent Review of Children’s Social Care (the “Care Review”).

Our team first conducted a review of the government’s actions and policy commitments for children’s social care in England following the completion of the Care Review. We incorporated the identified changes into a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) model we had developed during earlier work for the Care Review. We estimated the cost of delayed or limited action for all recommendations mentioned in the government’s strategy across two key policy scenarios: (i) delayed implementation, where the government implements the Care Review’s recommendations from 2025/26 onwards; and (ii) no further action, under which the government takes no further action after two years of the Stable Homes, Built on Love strategy (business-as-usual).

The outcome of this project was a comprehensive presentation that highlighted key figures, including (i) the cost of delay in fully implementing reforms per year and over the next 10 years; (ii) the number of children looked after that would have avoided care under full implementation of the Care Review’s recommendations; and (iii) the average cost to society over several time intervals. Our research has contributed significantly to the charities’ efforts to secure the necessary government investment in children’s services.

Our work received extensive press coverage including this report from Channel 4 News.


Youth Social Action: Rapid Evidence Assessment Department for Culture, Media and Sport

What makes young people participate in social action and what benefits do they get from it? Alma Economics was commissioned by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) to conduct a Rapid Evidence Assessment to answer these questions.

We wanted to ensure that our search covered as many studies as possible to answer these questions thoroughly. We used keywords to find relevant academic papers as well as evidence from organisations that are involved hands-on with youth social action. As expected, we found a very large number of papers which we then shortlisted to include the most relevant studies in a systematic way, using clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We ended up with the most relevant and recent international and UK-based evidence.

Volunteering pushes young people to develop empathy and confidence, become more civically engaged, and build a stronger sense of belonging to their communities. However, there are many inequalities that prevent young people from reaping these benefits, and greater attention should be paid to the inclusivity of social action programmes to ensure that they reach all young people. The internet and social media can help with this, as they push more young people to volunteer and allow them to contribute to issues that are important to them.

➥ The full report can be found here.


Supporting children and young people with their mental health and emotional wellbeing Local Government Association

Alma Economics was commissioned by the Local Government Association (LGA) to carry out research for a series of case studies identifying examples of good practice in supporting young people’s transition from Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) or to community-based services in England.

We carried out a number of semi-structured interviews with councils across England as well as with young people who have experienced the transition. Our work focused, in particular, on good practice raised by the councils as well as the feedback young people gave on the services they received, and further sought to record young people’s own recommendations for children’s and adults’ mental health services in England.

The report brings together overarching suggestions and recurring themes, acting as a valuable resource for councils that wish to restructure their mental health services for young people during their transition period.

Read the full report:

Supporting children and young people with their mental health and emotional wellbeing


UK public spending on babies, children, and young people

How much should the UK be spending to support its youngest generations?

Alma Economics was commissioned by a coalition of five of the UK’s leading children’s charities (Action for Children, Barnardo’s, the National Children’s Bureau, the NSPCC and The Children’s Society) to research public spending on babies, children, and young people in the UK. We sought to determine relevant spending levels as a percentage of the country’s GDP, and how this compares to other OECD countries.

We first conducted a review of UK and international literature on different methods of measuring spending on children. After deciding on our approach, we collated publicly available data on each of the key areas of expenditure – namely welfare, education, social care, and health.

Our analysis suggests that UK total spending on babies, children, and young people amounted to £191.1 billion or 8.57% of UK GDP in 2022-23. This is significantly less than the proportion of GDP spent by leading OECD counterparts.

By looking at spending in other OECD countries, we then explored benchmarks in different policy areas to suggest targets for UK spending. Our results indicate that the UK falls below the selected benchmarks in each policy area as well as in total.

Finally, we offered indicative evidence on the fiscal and social returns to spending on children in health, education, social care, and welfare.

This research informed a joint report published today by the charities calling for the next UK Government to put babies, children and young people at the heart of policymaking backed by a step-change in investment.

➥ The joint report, as well as the report produced Alma Economics, are both available here.


Operational research on the delivery of the EU Child Guarantee pilot in Greece UNICEF

Over the past 3 years, Greece was one of the four EU countries (alongside Bulgaria, Croatia and Italy) that introduced innovative models of services to transform child protection as part of the EU Child Guarantee pilot scheme. The Child Guarantee, launched in the EU in 2019, aspires to tackle child poverty and social exclusion through providing free access to education, healthcare and childcare, and ensuring decent housing and adequate nutrition.

Commissioned by the UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti, Alma Economics researchers in Athens conducted extensive operational research into the implementation of the pilot’s key innovative models. For Greece, these included:

  1. Supporting deinstitutionalisation and community-based care,

  2. Strengthening the foster care system,

  3. Introducing supported independent living,

  4. Investing in life skills and job readiness for vulnerable youth, and

  5. Strengthening inclusive education.

We talked to implementing partners, frontline and administrative staff of statutory organisations, as well as other programme and government officials about their experiences from the different stages of the pilot and how well these address child poverty and social exclusion in the country. In our interviews, we touched on different stages of the pilot for the interventions organised under each model, from preparation and planning to implementation and participation, and further discussed the sustainability and scalability of models going forward.

UNICEF has now published its synthesis report compiling research findings from all four pilot countries. We are very happy to see included in the report the important lessons learned from the Greek pilot which can contribute to the future expansion of the Child Guarantee across the EU.

➥ You can read the UNICEF synthesis report here.


 
 

Measuring Vulnerability The Children’s Commissioner for England

Alma Economics was commissioned by the Children’s Commissioner for England to conduct a comprehensive assessment of all available data on vulnerable children.

We contributed to the development of an analytical framework and helped identify a preliminary set of groups of vulnerable children by exploring definitions and available data publications. We then collected, summarised and analysed publicly available data across all identified groups, creating the first and most complete dataset of children's vulnerabilities in England. To add to the original analysis, we collated trends over time and explored, using statistical methods, how certain vulnerabilities can overlap.

To ensure the information we identified was comprehensive and accurate, we sought guidance from analysts in government departments and other public bodies including the Department for Education, Public Health England, and Ofsted, as well as from non-governmental organisations such as the Education Policy Institute and the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.

Our work has helped guide the development of the Children’s Commissioner’s agenda by identifying unmet needs, emerging trends, and research gaps. Our team continued collaborating with the Children’s Commissioner for England for several years after the original project, updating the data collected and producing bespoke analyses.

Relevant reports:

Children’s Commissioner’s annual study of childhood vulnerability in England (2018)

Measuring aggregate vulnerability in childhood (July 2018)

Estimating the number of vulnerable children – Totals (July 2017)

Estimating the number of vulnerable children – 29 groups (July 2017)

Infographic: overview of vulnerability (July 2017)

Estimating the number of vulnerable infants (May 2018)

 
 

Situation analysis of children and women in Afghanistan UNICEF

In the months prior to the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, Alma Economics worked with UNICEF to conduct the 2021 Situation Analysis of Children and Women in Afghanistan. Our work focussed on providing an up-to-date, comprehensive analysis of the realisation of children's and women’s rights in the country.

Using in-depth data analysis, interviews with key Afghan stakeholders, and desk-based research, the report provides an evaluation of the realisation of children's and women’s rights against a wide range of international conventions, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. It also includes recommendations across five dimensions: health and nutrition, education, protection from violence and exploitation, access to a secure and healthy environment, and the provision of resources that ensure a fair chance in life.

The Situation Analysis will inform the development of UNICEF’s Country Programme (2022-2025) and is expected to add value to the decision making of the wider audience relevant to the realisation of children’s rights, including development partners, civil society and private sector actors.

➥ Read the report here.


Implementing Barnahus in Latvia: Cost-benefit analysis OECD

The handling of cases where children have been exposed to violence or abuse requires an integrated approach. The Barnahus model aims to achieve this by bringing together various services under one roof to support children effectively and avoid their re-traumatisation.

Alma Economics was commissioned by the OECD to carry out a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of introducing the Barnahus model in Latvia. Our methodology was informed by a thorough evidence review which identified the impact of programmes similar to the Barnahus model. Additionally, we conducted interviews with sector experts to better understand the services currently received by child victims of, or witnesses to, violence and abuse, and supported a data collection exercise to fill in data gaps required to develop the CBA model.

Our team estimated the costs and benefits of the Barnahus model under different scenarios, concluding that it would generate higher benefits compared to its costs if it operated over the long-term (our model assumes 20 years of operation).

Our research findings are summarised in an OECD report which discusses the support required to establish the Barnahus model with the aim of ensuring multi-disciplinary and inter-institutional cooperation for child victims of violence, and improving the protection of children's rights.


Data analysis and forecasting for the UK adoption sector Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies

The Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies (CVAA) commissioned Alma Economics to undertake a three-part study for the publication of the Adoption Leadership Board quarterly data reports.

We initially assessed the credibility of data returns from local authorities (LA’s) and Voluntary Adoption Agencies related to children waiting to be adopted and prospective adoptive parents. This allowed us to produce two cleaned, complex datasets that could be used for analysis.

For the second part of the project, we summarised the data returns for Special Guardianship Orders (SGO’s) from LA’s in England and produced LA-level, regional and national SGO statistics as well as analysis highlighting key population and regional characteristics.

We also analysed the information collected by the CVAA on adoptions, children’s characteristics, adopters’ characteristics and timings through the adoption process to understand the trends and characteristics of the sector and produce conclusions with policy implications. We studied how inter-agency placements vary over time and across different children’s characteristics. Finally, we created a forecasting framework that could be used in the future to predict the gap between children waiting to be adopted and prospective parents on a quarterly basis.


Children’s Social Care Nationwide Sufficiency Statement Local Government Association

Alma Economics was commissioned by the Local Government Association (LGA) to develop a nationwide framework for sufficiency statements. Sufficiency statements are a key tool used by councils to deliver necessary children’s social care services.

Our team engaged with representatives from several councils across England through interviews and workshops to explore best practice and challenges in the production of sufficiency statements and to gather key insights on the development of a nationwide framework. We then combined existing data sources and data collected through a survey with councils to create a nationwide database on children’s placements. Finally, we developed a bespoke IT solution allowing us to create a detailed, individualised draft sufficiency statement for each council incorporating both national and council-level data.

Our framework for consistent monitoring of key trends across councils leads to an improved understanding of the breadth of the sector and provides actionable recommendations for future development.

➥ Download our Sufficiency Statement template here.


A Landscape Analysis of Childcare in Iraq

Alma Economics was commissioned to conduct a landscape analysis of the demand and supply of childcare services in Iraq.

Our study focused on childcare services catering for children up to 4 years of age and consisted of five components: (1) a mapping of childcare services, (2) a more in-depth supply assessment of childcare services, (3) a demand assessment of childcare services, (4) an analysis of operational costs, and (5) a review of relevant legislation.

Leading the research design, our team reviewed the primary data collection tools provided and tailored these to the cultural, socioeconomic, and legislative context of Iraq.

The project informed changes to childcare legislation, as well as the design of a childcare model that supports female employment and enhances early childhood development.


 
 

Review of the Childcare Sector in Wales Welsh Government

In the run-up to rolling out free childcare for 3- to 4-year-olds in Wales, the Welsh Government wanted a review of the childcare sector – including understanding capacity, costs, sustainability and identifying future challenges.

Alma Economics worked with the Welsh Government to develop a well-rounded understanding of the sector using a combination of data analysis, a review of existing evidence, and interviews with front-line staff across Wales.

The project, which included a scenario analysis of future costs under different policy regimes, provided valuable insights into the realities of the childcare sector.

➥ The report can be found on the Welsh Government website.

Outside of work, Nick loves spending time with his 2 daughters and is avid fan of Arsenal football club. He eagerly awaits the day his team celebrates the league title!
 
 

 
 

Town wide assessment of data Blackpool Council

To inform the implementation of the Opportunity Area and other programmes, Blackpool Council commissioned Alma Economics to undertake an analytical review to understand the key social mobility factors in Blackpool.

While social mobility can be defined in different ways, our report took a broad view and examined education, health, crime, and labour market transitions to understand the key issues affecting children and young people in Blackpool.

With a robust evidence base informed by community consultations, Opportunity Area Blackpool can identify key funding priorities to ensure that no one is left behind.

➥ The full report can be found here.

 
 
 

State of the market for child placements in South West England

Alma Economics was commissioned to analyse data on the state of the market for fostering, residential and special school child placements in South West England. The goal was to help understand and improve the way placements for looked after children are commissioned and delivered in the region.

Our main contributions were: (i) combining and analysing local authority-level data provided by the client, (ii) creating graphs and tables to facilitate analysis, and (iii) drafting four chapters to describe the findings. Furthermore, we attended workshops with project groups from each placement sector and edited the rest of the market position statement.

Finally, we provided key recommendations, including improving communication and relationships between local authorities and providers; improving access to education, health, and social care services; and creating models to ensure the best value for money.


Future Adoption Landscape

Alma Economics conducted a comprehensive study of the activity of Voluntary Adoption Agencies (VAAs) throughout the UK. Our team analysed trends in the adoption sector and produced projections of children flowing into the adoption system, the number of approved adoptions, and other data.

Our work included the development of a tool to project flows and costs to assist VAAs with strategy development and business planning.


Survey on looked after children

In collaboration with Royal Holloway, University of London, Alma Economics provided evidence on the causes of the increase in the rates of children entering care in England, including the impact of early intervention policies.

To do so, our team conducted surveys of care councillors, looked after children, and other stakeholders to better understand the increase in the number of children in care in England. The survey was part of the wider Knowledge Exchange Project “Key Challenges Facing Children and Young People in the UK”, funded by Research England.

Our team also conducted focused interviews with representatives of the third sector to understand the trend in entry rates across different age groups and to explore the associated challenges.

The collected data was used to develop targeted policies to improve the educational trajectories and cognitive development of looked after children.


Evaluating online safety education in schools: A feasibility study IICSA

Alma Economics was commissioned by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) to conduct a feasibility study to identify potential approaches for the implementation of a large-scale process and impact evaluation of e-safety education.

Our approach was to first understand the context of online safety provision by investigating the range of programmes and resources available to schools, and then assess a shortlist of methods that could be used to evaluate them.

To map e-safety provision in England and Wales, we carried out an online survey of schools and interviewed a range of key stakeholders, including representatives from the Department for Education, e-safety providers and Ofsted. The information collated allowed us to produce a database of 73 e-safety programmes for use by future evaluators.

We then assessed a list of evaluation methods against the following criteria: robustness, ethical considerations, the disruption to schools, the overall data burden, and resources. This analysis concluded with the recommendation of specific non-experimental evaluation methods.


New thinking on adoption funding: Proposals on the way forward

Alma Economics carried out an in-depth review of the way the adoption system is funded in England, with a particular focus on the elements relating to cross-organisational collaboration.

Our proposed reforms are consistent with the government’s strategy and vision, and can help ensure every child for whom adoption is right is placed quickly and efficiently with the most suitable family, while having access to effective support throughout the adoption process and in the post-adoption period.

➥ You can read the report here.


An Economic Evaluation of the 2014-2016 Department for Education Expansion Grant Programme The Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies

Adoption is a key area of interest for Alma Economics – we want to help improve outcomes for children and adopters by supporting meaningful, evidence-based interventions to address systemic challenges.  

Alma Economics was commissioned by the Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies (CVAA) to provide an independent economic evaluation of the Department for Education’s Expansion Grant Programme. With £12.5 million in committed government funding, the Programme ran from April 2014 to July 2016 and sought to increase adopter recruitment and strengthen capacity in the VAA sector.

Our team worked with grant recipients to understand issues around the design and administration of the programme. We conducted both process and impact evaluations using a combination of qualitative and quantitative analytical methods.

Our independent review helped inform policy discussions in England regarding the adoption landscape and measures to support the VAA sector.

➥ The full report is available here.


Blackpool Better Start Dashboard

Alma Economics worked with Blackpool Better Start to assist with monitoring impact and operational performance.

Blackpool is one of five areas across England in which local partnerships have been established and funded through Better Start, a 10-year, £215 million National Lottery-funded programme that aims to improve the life chances of babies and very young children by promoting good early childhood development.

Led by the NSPCC, the Blackpool Better Start partnership includes the Local Authority, Clinical Commissioning Group, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Lancashire Constabulary, and local community. It brings together local families, communities, and agencies from across public, private, and voluntary sectors.

We developed a user-friendly dashboard report to summarise and present data collected by Better Start Blackpool. This dashboard covers an extensive list of indicators to measure the progress and impact of activities funded by Blackpool Better Start and to provide the requisite context of how Blackpool compares with other parts of the country. We further designed a process and user guide so Blackpool Better Start staff can easily update the dashboard as new data becomes available.


Assessing plans for a London Regional Adoption Agency

Alma Economics assessed the potential benefits and costs of consolidating individual adoption agencies and creating a centralised London Regional Adoption Agency (LRAA).

In particular, our team was tasked with estimating the cost of providing adoption services in London, benchmarking the performance of the proposed members of the LRAA, and using this information to estimate the potential savings of transitioning to the LRAA.

Given the lack of high-quality information on adoption costs, we also gathered evidence using a set of surveys sent to all London councils. We then developed estimates regarding the cost-of-service provision and the potential impact of different centralisation scenarios.